пятница, 24 февраля 2012 г.

eCollege(R) CMS and Support Services Both Awarded Best in Category in IMS GLC Learning Technology Satisfaction and Trends Report.

DENVER, Feb. 12 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- eCollege(R) , a leading provider of value-added information services to the post-secondary education industry, today announced that its course management system (CMS) and support services both were awarded Best in Category in the IMS Global Learning Consortium (IMS GLC) Technology Satisfaction and Trends Report, released on February 12, 2007. The report is based on over two years of research uncovering best practices for success in Internet-supported learning.

"The IMS report takes a unique approach with its focus on user satisfaction, which is at the core of a successful teaching and learning experience," said Oakleigh Thorne, chairman and CEO of eCollege. "We are thrilled that eCollege ranked number one in both the CMS and services categories. At a time when vendor credibility is top of mind among institutions, this recognition is testament to our commitment to providing the highest quality products and unparalleled support for the growth and success of our customers' online programs."

eCollege also earned the number two spot on "The Top Ten" list of Internet-supported learning products based on overall user satisfaction. The Top Ten list represents a wide variety of products that highlight the importance of assessment, rich media and collaboration.

"Through our research, we are providing this rapidly evolving marketplace with information not only on the technologies themselves, but more importantly, trends in how these technologies are being used and supported," said Rob Abel, CEO of the IMS Global Learning Consortium. "The survey results indicate that eCollege delivers a best-of-breed solution, as evidenced by being rated best by the education community in both the CMS and support services categories."

The IMS Global Learning Consortium sponsors and performs this research, which represents responses from approximately 200 qualified leaders or decision makers involved in Internet-supported learning initiatives. The report is available at http://www.imsglobal.org/ltst/index.cfm.

IMS GLC is the world's largest and oldest standards consortium focused exclusively on learning standards since 1996. IMS GLC provides a neutral ground for industry participants to come together for advocacy of standards, recognition and best practices to enable learning impact.

IMS is hosting the Learning Impact 2007 and the Summit on Global Learning Industry Challenges in Vancouver, British Columbia April 16-19, 2007. The event brings together industry leaders to introduce and debate ideas on issues impacting the growth of learning worldwide. For more information, please visit http://www.imsglobal.org/learningimpact/agenda.html.

About eCollege

eCollege is a leading provider of value-added information services to the post-secondary and K-12 education industries. The Company's eLearning Division designs, builds and supports some of the most successful, fully online degree, certificate/diploma and professional development programs in the country. The Company's Enrollment Division, Datamark, Inc., helps institutions build new enrollments and increase student retention. Customers include publicly traded for-profit institutions, community colleges, public and private universities, school districts and state departments of education. eCollege was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Chicago, with the eLearning Division headquartered in Denver. Datamark was founded in 1987 and is headquartered in Salt Lake City. For more information, visit http://www.ecollege.com/ and http://www.datamark.com/.

This news release contains statements that are not historical in nature and that may be characterized as "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the securities laws. Examples of these forward-looking statements would include statements about the expected benefits to customers of our products or services and any other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks. Actual performance and results may differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements due to general financial, economic, regulatory and political conditions affecting the Company's industries as well as the more specific risks and uncertainties facing the Company, including those identified in the Company's reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which you are encouraged to review in connection with this release. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of this release. We are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements to reflect events after the date of this release.

eCollege is a registered trademark of eCollege.

CONTACT: Kristi Emerson of eCollege, +1-303-873-3788, kristie@eCollege.com

Web site: http://www.ecollege.com/

American Airlines Reports January Traffic.

American Airlines, the world's largest carrier, reported a January load factor of 73.3 percent. This year's January load factor was 4.4 points higher than last year. Traffic during the month grew by 8.1 percent, while capacity increased 1.7 percent year over year.

International traffic increased 13.5 percent relative to last year on 11.4 percent more capacity. Domestic traffic grew by 5.5 percent compared to last year on a reduction in capacity of 2.7 percent.

   American boarded 7.45 million passengers in January.    Detailed traffic and capacity data are on the following pages:                         AMERICAN AIRLINES PASSENGER DIVISION                    COMPARATIVE PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC SUMMARY                           EXCLUDES CHARTER SERVICES                                     January                                      2005           2004         CHANGE    REVENUE PASSENGER MILES (000)      SYSTEM                      10,569,058      9,775,894        8.1 %         D.O.T. DOMESTIC           6,950,218      6,586,945        5.5         INTERNATIONAL             3,618,840      3,188,948       13.5         ATLANTIC                  1,255,555      1,173,044        7.0         LATIN AMERICA             1,982,197      1,698,644       16.7         PACIFIC                     381,088        317,261       20.1     AVAILABLE SEAT MILES (000)      SYSTEM                      14,412,466     14,173,941        1.7 %         D.O.T. DOMESTIC           9,490,083      9,754,075       (2.7)         INTERNATIONAL             4,922,383      4,419,866       11.4         ATLANTIC                  1,701,525      1,616,256        5.3         LATIN AMERICA             2,726,265      2,402,370       13.5         PACIFIC                     494,593        401,240       23.3     LOAD FACTOR      SYSTEM                            73.3 %         68.9 %      4.4  Pts         D.O.T. DOMESTIC                73.2           67.5        5.7         INTERNATIONAL                  73.5           72.1        1.4         ATLANTIC                       73.7           72.5        1.2         LATIN AMERICA                  72.7           70.7        2.0         PACIFIC                          77             79       (2.0)     PASSENGERS BOARDED             7,453,409      6,957,086        7.1 %     SYSTEM CARGO TON MILES (000)     169,378        159,357        6.3 %                         AMERICAN AIRLINES PASSENGER DIVISION                    COMPARATIVE PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC SUMMARY                           EXCLUDES CHARTER SERVICES                              YEAR-TO-DATE January                                       2005          2004          CHANGE    REVENUE PASSENGER MILES (000)      SYSTEM                       10,569,058     9,775,894         8.1 %         D.O.T. DOMESTIC            6,950,218     6,586,945         5.5         INTERNATIONAL              3,618,840     3,188,948        13.5         ATLANTIC                   1,255,555     1,173,044         7.0         LATIN AMERICA              1,982,197     1,698,644        16.7         PACIFIC                      381,088       317,261        20.1     AVAILABLE SEAT MILES (000)      SYSTEM                       14,412,466    14,173,941         1.7 %         D.O.T. DOMESTIC            9,490,083     9,754,075        (2.7)         INTERNATIONAL              4,922,383     4,419,866        11.4         ATLANTIC                   1,701,525     1,616,256         5.3         LATIN AMERICA              2,726,265     2,402,370        13.5         PACIFIC                      494,593       401,240        23.3    LOAD FACTOR      SYSTEM                             73.3 %        68.9 %       4.4 Pts         D.O.T. DOMESTIC                 73.2          67.5         5.7         INTERNATIONAL                   73.5          72.1         1.4         ATLANTIC                        73.7          72.5         1.2         LATIN AMERICA                   72.7          70.7         2.0         PACIFIC                           77            79        (2.0)    PASSENGERS BOARDED               7,453,409     6,957,086         7.1 %    SYSTEM CARGO TON MILES (000)       169,378       159,357         6.3 %                 AmericanAirlines(R)  We know why you fly(SM)   Current AMR Corp.  releases can be accessed on the Internet.                      The address is http://www.aa.com/  

CONTACT: Tim Wagner, Corporate Communications of American Airlines, +1-817-967-1577, or corp.comm@aa.com

Web site: http://www.aa.com/

Bush enters second term with mandate for agenda.

Byline: Mark Silva

WASHINGTON _ Reconfirmed to lead a nation facing a dangerous era abroad and a divided society at home, President Bush will enter his second term with an historic opportunity to pursue his agenda _ but also to reunite his enemies.

In winning re-election, with both a clear majority and a record number in the popular vote, Bush has a strengthened political ally in Congress with a bolstered Republican majority. This could enable Bush to both enact new policies and deliver on unfulfilled promises of his first term.

Yet Bush also will lead an electorate more polarized than ever, and the passions of this election are likely to smolder for months to come.

In addition, he faces a challenge of repairing international allegiances riven with a largely unilateral foreign policy, bringing to justice the terrorists who attacked New York City and the Pentagon and resolving the protracted conflict in Iraq while fulfilling the promise of free elections there.

Unlike his father, popular at war but burdened with a slumping economy, Bush has won a chance to finish what he started. Bush is, in the words of longtime friend and former aide Joe Allbaugh, "a president comfortable in his own skin," and his re-election should make him more confident in the power of his own personal persuasion.

"A new term is a new opportunity to reach out to the whole nation," Bush said Wednesday, accepting his re-election with an appeal to the nearly half of all voters who supported Democrat John Kerry.

Bush has a stated second-term agenda of simplifying the federal tax code, winning private retirement savings accounts for younger workers, improving public education and, certainly not least difficult, waging an ongoing war against international terrorism.

This president has much working for him in his second term, according to a seasoned Republican pollster, Neil Newhouse. For starters, as Bush himself said Wednesday, this was his "last campaign."

"Unencumbered by pressures of re-election, he has an opportunity to push for goals that he may have deemed too politically risky," said Newhouse of Public Opinion Strategies in Virginia.

"With GOP majorities in the House and Senate increased, he should have a little easier time getting legislation passed," he said. "Given the Democrats' disarray, and the president's convincing win, the Democrats may lack a unifying voice or force to provide opposition."

But in order to accomplish his agenda, Bush must restore relationships in Congress shattered in an increasingly partisan rift that started with most members of the House and Senate supporting his tax cuts and education reforms and also the invasion of Iraq.

A nearly two-year election campaign for the White House among Democrats increasingly challenging Bush has replaced the early coalition-building of the Bush White House with a bunker-like relationship between Republicans and Democrats in Washington.

Karl Rove, Bush's chief political adviser and "architect" of the re-election campaign, predicts an improved environment in Washington.

"I do think that in a second term there is a likelihood that some of the ... partisanship will drop away," Rove predicted. "We've reached out and worked with Democrats who are willing to work with us."

This will include a renewed pitch on Social Security changes. Bush wants to allow younger workers to invest some of their retirement savings privately, in order to build a better "nest egg" than what Social Security provides for the elderly.

At the same time, he promises to protect benefits for current workers, including Baby Boomers such as himself. Opponents maintain, however, that Bush's privatization of accounts will both jeopardize investors and undermine the financial health of the system.

Not the least of his concerns during the second term: Waging war against terrorism, which he made the linchpin of his re-election. Bush, who campaigned in 2000 with promises to avert "nation-building" with the U.S. military, says he wants to help "emerging democracies" in Iraq and Afghanistan. He maintains Iraq can hold elections in January.

Some question Bush's sincerity for repairing any of the relations that have made Europeans skeptical of the United States' motives, accusing the administration of going it alone on some foreign policy issues.

___

(c) 2004, Chicago Tribune.

Visit the Chicago Tribune on the Internet at http://www.chicagotribune.com/

Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

_____

PHOTOS (from KRT Photo Service, 202-383-6099):

For information on republishing this content, contact us at (800) 661-2511 (U.S.), (213) 237-4914 (worldwide), fax (213) 237-6515, or e-mail reprints@krtinfo.com.

четверг, 23 февраля 2012 г.

PSNI Chief To Handle Claim On IRA Role Of McGuinness.(News)

Byline: STEPHEN DEMPSTER

ALLEGATIONS made about Martin McGuinness's role in the IRA will be handled by PSNI Chief Constable Hugh Orde, it emerged last night.

The police are currently examining a complaint made to them in light of claims made by Freddie Scappaticci that the Sinn Fein negotiator had a role in luring IRA informer Frank Hegarty to his death in 1986.

It is also claimed that he was a member of the IRA Army Council at the height of its terror campaign in the 1980s and 1990s.

Mr McGuinness yesterday reiterated his denial of any involvement in Frank Hegarty's murder, and said he left the IRA in the mid-1970s.

After a recording of the claims was passed to the News Letter several weeks ago and then posted on the internet, victims' group FAIR made a statement to the police demanding an inquiry.

Last night, FAIR spokesman William Frazer said that a high-ranking police officer has told him the matter is being looked into.

He said: "I was told the tape is now in the hands of Assistant Chief Constable Maggie Hunter but that ultimately it will go to Hugh Orde who will have the final decision to make on what to do with it.

"My statement on the matter is clear, as the relatives of victims and acting for other relatives, I want to see Mr Scappaticci questioned and McGuinness questioned."

The allegations against him have been circulating for more than a decade.

But now that the tape recording of west Belfast ex-IRA man Scappaticci making the claims has been aired on the internet and the UTV Insight programme - along with an admission from "Scap" that it was him on the tape - pressure is mounting for an investigation.

Meanwhile, one of Stakeknife's Army handlers has been co-operating with the Stevens Inquiry into collusion.

It is alleged the man from Northern Ireland, who is suffering from a terminal illness, has come clean on the alleged activities of Stakeknife - the top British agent in the IRA.

He worked for the British Army's secretive Force Research Unit (FRU) which handled Stakeknife, who it is alleged was guided to kill at the British State's request.

Among the victims, it is claimed, were other British agents in the IRA who the Army no longer had a use for.

Stakeknife has been named as Scappaticci, although he continues to deny this allegation.

s.dempster@newsletter.co.uk

Selling the case for the buyer's market: the promise of venture capital riches was too good for many businesses to refuse -- but Paul Hoskins didn't succumb. He reports his preferred strategy. (Design Business).

TWO years ago, like many owners of design companies with a technological capability, I was being hounded by venture capitalists, software companies and various design and advertising groups with the promise of untold wealth.

In exchange, all they needed was a simple signature that would deliver my company into the hands of the 'board' -- normally a remote group of people who knew little about design and answered only to the 'investors' -- a nameless group of individuals, normally in the US, who were planning to float on the stock market for vast profit.

I must admit I was tempted, not only for the money, but also for what it would allow us to deliver. However, even then, when paper millionaires were being made every day, I remembered 'all that glitters is not gold'.

One of the downsides of the advent of digital media is that groups such as ours are now expected to deliver everything -- from branding and communications consultancy through to the design-and-build of complex intranets. This requires a broad skills base (ie critical mass of staff), which in the current climate is widely available, but without the clients to pay for it.

While most people's reaction to the current downturn is to pull in their horns and reduce core offerings, I believe there is an alternative that doesn't involve selling to a bigger group. In the last Design Business, Paul Foulkes-Arrellano looked at partnering with other organisations (DW 27 March). I suggest there are also opportunities to acquire companies that are currently struggling, that fill gaps in your delivery and that can be secured at very reasonable cost.

Nine months ago I put my theory to the test. Precedent acquired Pinnacle Internet, an Internet service provider with a strong development capability, but little sales ability, and transformed it from what was arguably a company without a future into an extremely profitable subsidiary.

For anyone thinking of pursuing a similar option, you may be interested in a few simple things this experience taught me -- some of which we had covered and some of which we didn't.

While no sensible person would proceed with such a venture without considering how much it might cost in terms of purchase price, it is too easy to forget the hidden costs--the main one being the call on management time. You may well have a robust management infrastructure. However, you should not underestimate the effect on key personnel during the weeks of time required for negotiations. It will disrupt the delicate balance of skills that makes any company work.

If after careful thought you are still keen to proceed, how do you go about selecting organisations to approach? First, ignore those that are just a smaller version of your own company. Instead, identify gaps in your offering, ones that will widen your portfolio and allow you to cross sell without significantly increasing the existing burden on your own staff.

The next most important thing, even before the numbers are crunched, is culture fit. If the culture of the two organisations cannot be reconciled you will find that in a short space of time you have bought nothing, as both staff and clients will quickly abandon ship, leaving you with a whole bunch of liabilities and no assets.

Look for organisations where the owners are not heavily involved and where the second tier of management is capable, but, more importantly, ambitious. These individuals should be just waiting to be given the chance to prove themselves and happy to adjust how they work to this end.

Having found an organisation that 'fits the bill', be very careful with the lawyer's bill. One of my biggest mistakes in our acquisition was the delegation of the contracts to a large City law firm. It added months to the negotiations, not to mention many thousands of pounds of expense. Hindsight suggests a face-to-face meeting with the vendors, followed with a heads of agreement letter prior to passing to the lawyers (who spend more time covering their butts than yours) is a far better option.

My final point is this; once the purchase has been made, it is imperative that you achieve that crucial symbiosis between the personal and collective objectives of both staff and companies. This needs to be done in the early weeks of integration and should not be underestimated as a task.

To sum up, acquisition is a better option than organic growth in the current climate and something that should be considered if it would help your organisation to better meet its goals.

However, don't neglect your existing commitments, don't underestimate how the process can unnerve your own staff, as well as the target company's, and don't be blinded by financial and legal speak'. Yes, you need accountants and lawyers and yes, you need to be 100 per cent sure you can afford to undertake the process. But never underestimate your own business acumen -- undertake the bulk of the negotiations and deal construction yourself and, most crucially of all, use your common sense. Happy hunting.

Paul Hoskins is managing director of Precedent

RISING POWER: PR'S VALUE IN THE DIGITAL AGE - ROSANNA FISKE KEYNOTE AT HISPANICIZE CONFERENCE.(Conference news)

New York, NY -- The following information was released by the Public Relations Society of America:

Keynote Address u Hispanicize Hispanic PR and Social Media Conference

Thank you, Manny. Buenas tardes a good afternoon. I am so happy to join you here! This is such an important moment in time for PRSA and to be here with you, that this year, I didn't come alone. I want to recognize two of my PRSA national team members who are here with me today u Bill Murray, our president and COO, and Marisa Vallbona, a member of our board of directors.

We come together for this exciting conference u the second of what has already become an influential industry gathering u to discuss public relations and social media in the U.S. Hispanic market.

I come before you four months into my tenure as chair of the board of directors and CEO of the Public Relations Society of America, a 32,000-plus member organization, the largest in the world. This is a professional opportunity that is immensely enlightening for me, and one that I am privileged to pursue.

I'm also a professor at Florida International University, and many of my former students are here today as professionals. Let's see hands u where are you?

After many years on the agency and corporate side, this is the best part of my life u mentoring the next generation of public relations and advertising professionals.

Like many of you, I have seen the dramatic changes that have taken place in our profession over the past decade, and viewed more broadly, since I started in my first corporate position. In case you can't hear the excitement in my voice, let me make some points clear, right off the top:

After all this time, I'm still incredibly passionate about our profession; where our industry is heading; how it helps businesses grow; how public relations serves the public good; and the role we play in protecting and advancing the free flow of accurate and truthful information that is essential to democratic societies.

It's a responsibility that I do not take lightly, both my role leading PRSA and my belief in public relations' ability to do good for the world u for society and for the clients and organizations we counsel.

As you know, we're in a time of significant global political upheaval, augmented by our own domestic concerns. This is what my grandfather would refer to as an "arroz con mango."

But more seriously, in preparing these remarks, I asked myself whether there were something in my own experience that may be helpful to others u to business people in general, and in particular, public relations professionals. Were there some principles, perhaps, that can add perspective to what you and many of your colleagues have come here to learn about?

If you know me, then you know I am proud to be Hispanic. Most definitions do not define me as a Latina, but because I have lived and worked within this environment my entire professional life, I clearly identify with the Hispanic/Latino culture.

I'm not here solely to talk about what it means to be a Latina, the various nuances of marketing to this demographic and whether marketing to mi abuelo is the same as marketing to su abuelo.

What I am here to discuss with you today is a rising power in the global marketplace u the rising power of public relations.

And while I won't tell you how long I've worked in public relations a let's just say that Bush 41 was in office at the time, gas most certainly didn't cost $4 a gallon and Mark Zuckerberg was, oh, only about 4 or 5 years old and the GoGo's was the up-and-coming hot chic band a social media referred to the new era of watching music videos on television.

But, today a today, it's absolutely remarkable the power that social media has given consumers, businesses, community activists, future presidents a you name it. And no, I don't intend for this to turn into a "Social Media is Amazing!" speech. We've all heard that, and there's no point rehashing it.

But think about what you do now and put that into perspective of what you did, say, five years ago. 10 years ago. 20 years ago. Does anything remotely look the same now as it did then?

Perhaps. Then again, five years ago, Twitter was just getting off the ground.

Ten years ago, most websites still looked like an Etch-A-Sketch, with lines and dots seemingly going nowhere but claiming to connect us everywhere and to everyone.

Twenty years ago a the commercial Internet barely existed; word processors were the name of the game -- who here remembers Xywrite, WordPerfect and Multimate? And our fax machines and pagers were nearly as ubiquitous as today's iPhones.

Remember the original cell phone that looked more like a concrete block with a protruding black antenna? Try making that fit in your Gucci bag a not pretty.

The truth is, we've gone from needing half a dozen tools to communicate u a word processor, whiteout, an AP Stylebook, a fax machine, a landline phone, a pager, etc. u to just one: the smartphone.

Mobile technology, more so than anything else in the past 20 years, has transformed PR and marketing into thriving industries. What used to take 5 hours now takes as little as 15 minutes. We can draft a release on our phones, edit and proof it, send it to our various contacts, Tweet it and post it to Facebook in less time than it used to take to get our IBM selectric to erase the last typo.

All of that is but one small sliver of the total hemisphere of public relations' value and influence. In the U.S. alone, spending on public relations services now exceeds $4 billion annually, and it is projected to jump 55 percent by 2013, to more than $8 billion.

This, from a business that just a few years ago, some called irrelevant. How many of you heard the occasional "Public relations is stale; it's outdated; it's all about one-way push communications, rather than actual engagement with the public."

Well, let's just say it wasn't even considered worthy of a quincea[+ or -]era party. It was advertising's ugly step sister.

Dios mio, how times have changed!

I relayed those figures I quoted a moment ago to a reporter at the Financial Times with whomI had lunch recently in New York. He was very surprised at the robust growth in public relations calling it "palpable" u he's used to holding-company CEOs boasting about their latest bottom lines, or what barely exists of them now. He was so surprised, in fact, that he came back to the numbers 10 minutes later and asked me if this could possibly be true. It is.

And as I told the Financial Times reporter, businesses and executives often don't realize they need strategic public relations until it's too late . . . PRSA is out to change that perception.

Just a few weeks ago, eMarketer released a report that found that among the top-25 principals in advertising, marketing and public relations agencies, PR professionals are the most effective when it comes to leveraging social media. This is huge. For the first time, three inter-related disciplines have agreed that public relations is really the owner of social media.

I'd have to agree!

Assessing Public Relations' Value

This begs the question: what exactly is public relations' overall value? We can't be all things to all people. That's a recipe for disaster. There already exist too many snake oil salesmen and gurus, who are out to make a quick buck or two on an unassuming CMO, who happens to be overwhelmed with the dozens of new social networks, CMS platforms, and analytics tools that come out each year a one replacing the other, one making the other obsolete.

But communicators u specifically, public relations executives u are especially prepared for adjusting and adapting to change. We're used to telling CEOs and upper management those famous words from Beyonce a indeed the latest and greatest of anything is likely going to be replaced by something else. You know, to the left, to the left a If social media has taught us anything is that don't you ever for one second get to thinking, you're irreplaceable!

This is the opportunity for public relations. Marketers are growing tired. "Where should I market my brand online?" seems to get more attention from overwhelmed marketers than to whom should my brand reach and impact?

But, in public relations, we stand for something greater. We reach beyond the lowest common denominator to ensure public relations' value is not compromised by the swift dealings of a few. After all, the next big thing will always be on the horizon. Any marketer or PR professional worth his salt should not be selling his services to clients based solely on helping them tap into the next big thing. Public relations is about building a reputation, through solid and credible relationships, over time.

That brings us to the really big question all of us are faced with every day: What do today's CEOs want and need most?

If you were to ask the public, they would likely tell you CEOs need better reputations. It's doubtful many would argue that sentiment.

I read a recent post in The New York Times'' "You're The Boss" blog that put the need for improved CEO reputations into perspective. In it, the author relayed a story from a CEO with a school-age son, who came home one day and asked if his father would call himself something other than a CEO. It seems that the boy's classmates were giving him a hard time about the fact that his father runs a company u as if it were something to be embarrassed by.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement for modern executives.

We're at a precipitous moment for trust in American, not only trust in our institutions u government, health care, insurance u but in business. American capitalism u the driving force behind what has helped make first- and second-generation immigrants, like me, successful in this country in a relatively short period of time.

As the 2011 Edelman Trust Barometer indicates, trust in American businesses, and by extension, the reputations of corporations and their leaders, is now at an all-time low, at just 46 percent, or barely above last-place Russia. Yes, you heard right a Russia.

Think about that for a moment: trust in the American business community u the very clients you represent and the organizations you work for u is barely above the level of that in a country still struggling with the modern concept of free enterprise and democracy. That's a somewhat disturbing thought.

All of which leads me to believe we're at a monumental moment for the public relations industry.

Despite the worst economic recession any of us have experienced, and hopefully will never have to endure again, public relations is actually growing u rapidly.

Certainly, no one can say public relations is merely an add-on or "nice to have" service anymore. It is a must-have a you know, the kind that you-better-have-it-or-you're-going-to-regret-it type of service a

Why do I say that? Well, aside from the fact that it's kind of my job (I mean, I wouldn't be much of a CEO for PRSA if I said otherwise!), anecdotal evidence and data all back me up.

Take, for example, the recent New York Times small-business blogger, restaurant owner Bruce Buschel.

Have you heard of this guy? Take a look around you, and it's a good bet that the person sitting on either side of you has, and he or she can tell you all about his viewpoints on the value of public relations, or his belief in a lack thereof. Let's put it this way: he thinks we all suck. And that's putting it kindly.

Mr. Buschel recently went on a three-week tirade against public relations. At first, it seemed innocent enough. He wrote a post called "The Problem with Public Relations." Not exactly original, but hey, the guy isn't like you and me (clearly).

It seems that Mr. Buschel has a beef u no pun intended u with a couple of New York City agencies that he hired to help generate buzz u ugh, that awful word, buzz. Is there a translation for buzz in Spanish? "Buzzear?"

Let's forget I ever said that, OK? Great. Back to Mr. Buschel's restaurant. He hired a PR firm for the opening of his new restaurant in the Hamptons on Long Island. Everything goes well until the firm starts providing counsel, as any good PR agency or PR professional should. Apparently, Mr. Buschel doesn't take too kindly to market research and to counsel from the very professionals he hires to do just that.

Fast forward two weeks. After hundreds of commenters patiently tried to explain to him the very real, business value of public relations, Mr. Buschel still didn't get it. He pens another blog post, this time condescendingly breaking down some rather good points from one commenter, and showing that he clearly had no intention of ever trying to understand public relations' true business value.

But then he throws us all a 180. His last post on the subject, titled, "Arriving Late at the Social Media Party," shows Mr. Buschel walking us through how many professionals, some of whom may even be one of you in the audience today, patiently helped him understand the new realities of public relations and marketing in the digital age u the fact that that dreaded word, "buzz," means very little in a world where consumer sentiment can change hourly, if not instantly.

That means actually understanding what it is your customers want from your business, rather than what you think they want or, heaven forbid, what you want them to want, is one of the greatest modern marketing challenges facing businesses today.

In essence, these professionals who commented on the blog, were working pro bono, offering Mr. Buschel and his thousands of New York Times readers, the best counsel and perspective of public relations' strategic business value one could ask for.

Let me sum up what the hundreds of comments boiled down to:

It's no longer about you. It's about them. It's about what others want, desire and need from your business. And ranting and raving about how a PR firm that you hired doesn't understand what it is that YOU want, but is trying to help you understand what THEY want, isn't going to get YOU anywhere.

So what initially looked like another mass attack on the value of public relations, turned into a vast crowdsourced initiative of how public relations has stepped up to meet businesses modern communications challenges.

And that brings us to an interesting debate that has heated up in recent months within the industry: redefining what public relations is. What is the definition of our work? What do we do? And what value do we truly have?

Do your abuelos understand it? Heck, does your mami or papi understand it?

It's a great question to ask, and one that many of my colleagues at PRSA have been exploring for quite some time. If you look at PRSA's definition of public relations, what many consider the industry's de facto definition, it says:

"Public relations helps an organization and its publics adapt mutually to each other."

OK a that's all well and good, but it doesn't strike me as particularly relevant in 2011. Or even in 1995. Perhaps that is because PRSA's definition was established in 1982, and it hasn't been updated since because we can't find industry consensus on the definition. That's right: what our industry uses to define its work is a concept that is now 30 years old.

Let me offer some perspective here. The last five years, let alone the past decade, have given rise to forms of communication that many of us never dreamed possible. Thus, the working definition of public relations has changed dramatically. What was once considered a form of "push" communications has now clearly evolved into a more prosperous and valuable two-way communication platform in which brands, organizations, governments, non-profits, NGOs, are able to communicate and engage directly with key audiences in a mutually beneficial manner.

What this all means is that it's likely time we explore how we can modernize, revise and update this definition to meet today's modern communications challenges our clients and employers face.

Many of my industry colleagues, some of you, perhaps, have thoughtfully debated for several weeks u months, maybe years? u what public relations truly means. What it means today, and more importantly, what it will need to mean tomorrow, five years from now and perhaps, 30 years down the road.

However, just like protests don't resolve policy questions, blog posts and endless talk don't resolve what is at its heart a complicated issue: redefining the essence of what we do. It is time to move past endless talk and start laying the groundwork for progress.

I keep coming back to this theme of meeting today's modern business challenges because that is precisely what public relations professionals, marketing professionals, social media folks u you name it u must be doing in order to sustain our value to the business community and continue to develop innovative methods of helping businesses prosper.

It's that simple a well, if only it really were.

Let's bring it back to the Hispanic market. That's why we're all here, right? To learn more about how we can tap into this immensely rich, innovative and hungry market of 50-million-plus.

All of the talk over the past year, from blog posts, tweet chats to conferences like this has focused on just how lucrative the Hispanic market will be once the dust settles from the 2010 Census.

Will mainstream marketers finally wake up to the reality that there is an immense market in America that is waiting, actually, make that begging, to be leading?

They better. Because as my good friend Glenn Llopis is fond of saying, "Hispanics are the mainstream in America."

Are we the same now as we were, say, 20 years ago, when Hispanic marketing leaped from novel concept to the market de jour? Not even close.

I thought Hernan Lopez, president of Fox International Channels, said it best when he wrote recently in Advertising Age, that "This is not your abuela's Latino community of two decades ago. A new generation has emerged, with a new Latino DNA, and marketers who fail to decode it will struggle to survive."

Many of those 50 million, and I count myself among them, are first- second-, third- or even fourth-generation immigrants. They come from families deeply rooted in their native culture. But somewhere along the way, Hispanics in America have changed. We have grown so quickly, and have been so eager to fit in with American business, that in many ways we've lost a part of our identity.

Again, I have to give all the credit to Glenn Llopis of the Center for Hispanic Leadership for really pushing this idea. Glenn and I became fast friends over this ideology.

We need to reclaim our identity, and stand firm behind it.

As communicators, this presents an incredible challenge. And yet, it's also a powerful opportunity.We, and by we, I'm talking about marketing and public relations professionals a we must resolve to not resort to the lowest common denominator or the easy way out in our marketing to Hispanics.

It would be incredibly easy for us to merely allow Hispanic marketing and communications to stand still in time; to take the lowest common denominator. Almost as though we were stuck in 1990.

We must avoid this temptation. We must aspire to something greater; an earnest effort to continue innovating Hispanic marketing and public relations, to continue talking with Hispanics as though we are the new mainstream in America. Because we are.

And to tempt fate with a market as big as 50 million Americans and $1 trillion in annual spending power would be bad karma or mala suerte. Not to mention it's just bad business.

You still have marketing that largely plays to stereotypical themes. That's not to say all Hispanic marketing is like this, but I know from growing up as a global Hispanic, who moved to America to attend high school, the Hispanic marketing that came from big American corporations in the 80s wasn't exactly what you would call enlightening.

And it wasn't anything close to the type of iconic marketing that mainstream American audiences saw in English-language media.

Things started to turn around in the mid-1990s. An upsurge of agencies focusing on Hispanics, combined with powerhouse TV networks Univision and Telemundo coming into their own, helped communicators realize that simply dubbing over American commercials with lousy Spanish wasn't going to cut it anymore.

Maybe we shouldn't have expected anything more. After all, Hispanics were not the mainstream demographic in America 20 years ago. Even 10 years ago, we were still a fast-rising segment, sure, but we were still lurking somewhere in the background. Every business knew it needed to get up-to-speed with the power of Hispanic marketing, but few were ready to jump all the way in pending conclusive data that clearly showed, "yes, this demographic is here to stay!"

It is far more powerful than we ever imagined.

Well, I'm here to tell you, that data has come. By now, I'm sure you've all seen the 2010 Census data. And we all know the numbers. Add to that that advertising spending on Hispanic media is up 164 percent since 2001 to $3.88 billion. There are hundreds of Spanish-language TV and radio stations across the U.S. Thousands of publications and blogs dedicated to Hispanic audiences.

You need a little more proof? The beloved telenovela, "La Reina del Sur" u "Queen of the South" u is routinely beating English-language networks' TV shows, averaging millions of viewers per night in 3 of the top 10 DMAs in the country. Imagine that: a show entirely in Spanish that airs primarily in America is beating English-language shows at their own game of attracting eyeballs, ad dollars and the coveted 18-to-34-year-old audience.

Put into greater perspective, the U.S. Hispanic population is now greater than all of Canada's. And, we would be the fifth largest country in Europe.

Going back to my point earlier about not resorting to the lowest common denominator in our marketing to Hispanics, the easy thing to do would be to look at these numbers and think, "Gee, we should just keep doing what we've always been doing because it's worked."

But where would the fun be in that? And more importantly, what message would we be sending America's newest mainstream demographic by essentially telling Hispanics that the status quo is good enough for us?

Katy Perry wouldn't like it. She challenges to ignite the light, to be a firework, to show what we're worth, to make them go "aw, aw, aw" as we shoot across the "sky, sky, sky."

Maybe that's not going to work. But then again we have social media.

Social Media's Presence u and Power u in the Hispanic Community

Despite the prevalence of white, non-Hispanic Caucasians on social media, a great migration is currently taking place within diverse cultures.

Whereas even 2 to 3 years ago, many non-white cultures preferred more traditional forms of marketing and communications, culturally-diverse demographics represent one of the fastest growing segments of social media.

A 2010 PRSA survey found that 36 percent of English-preferring Hispanics regularly used social networks.

All of which points to a marketplace for PR and marketing professionals that looks nothing like it did five years ago.

Marketing to diverse cultures, whether Hispanic-Americans, Asian-Americans, African-Americans, etc., is a remarkably complex, and yet oddly simple, concept.

At the end of the day, everyone has similar human instincts to connect with each other; to relate to others' experiences; to share in the excitement, the sorrow, the joy and the fear of life.

That transcends cultures, and it is at the heart of what makes public relations successful: reaching a variety of diverse audiences in ways that impact their lives and help them to connect with something meaningful and authentic to them and to their culture.

At the same time, reality tells us that there are vast cultural differences we must keep in mind when communicating with different cultures u whether via a press release, a TV interview or on Twitter.

As a Latina, I can tell you that the way I communicate with my Latina followers on Twitter is vastly different to how I would communicate with a culture that is more reserved -- or less affectionate. That's all part of understanding, and more importantly, respecting, cultural differences in how we communicate.

Our communications need to stand for something more. We need to be the generation of Hispanic communicators that sets the tone for the level of creativity and innovation that will define diverse marketing for generations to come. We need to be the next generation of Shakiras.

There is a responsibility among successful Hispanic business leaders to speak on behalf of our colleagues and really say we need to do something to develop more leaders.

Because if we don't, where are all of these 50 million people, and the millions of others they influence, going to look for leadership and insight? Where will the next generation of young professional Hispanic-Americans look to for guidance?

And to clearly demonstrate that, we need to market it and we need to communicate it.

We must give hope to other professionals and aspiring young Hispanics who someday wish to become business leaders because we are the mainstream of today and tomorrow.

We are the next generation of American leadership.

!En buena hora! Muchas gracias.